Over the past few decades, we’ve gone through three 11-year solar cycles. The most recent cycle, known as Solar Cycle 24, ended just a few months ago. These cycles are measured by solar output, with high peaks representing maximum solar activity and heat reaching Earth.
Since the end of Solar Cycle 23, there has been no measurable increase in solar output. In fact, current levels are notably lower than those during the peak of that cycle. This means the Earth is now receiving less heat from the sun than it did just a few years ago.
Today, we’re witnessing record cold temperatures in many parts of the world. Glaciers have halted their retreat, Arctic ice is regrowing, Antarctic ice has reached record highs, and Northern Hemisphere snowpacks are larger than we’ve seen in recent memory.
Ironically, back at the beginning of Solar Cycle 23, many of the same voices now warning about global warming were raising alarms about global cooling.
This predictable pattern follows not only the well-known 11-year Sunspot Cycle (in which more sunspots mean greater solar output and warming across the solar system), but also mimics the classic predator-prey dynamic — like the fox-and-rabbit cycle. When solar activity rises, temperatures increase, and we hear a chorus of concern about global warming. When solar activity drops, the climate cools — and fears of global cooling re-emerge.
Unfortunately, unlike foxes and rabbits that respond swiftly to changes in their environment, the “Climate Cycle Commentators” react slowly, clinging to old narratives. Their shifts in focus lag well behind the actual data — making their cycle not only less scientific, but also less credible.
