While transcribing recent Lie Committee reports from the Energy Committee, I noticed a great deal of conversation about “sustainability”, a popular thought process that leads to the paralysis so beloved by the other side. The Lie Committee correctly determined “Since nothing is sustainable, only nothing is sustainable.”
I had to read that twice until realizing that the perpetual leftist nihilism had been given a new name. In sustainability, only organizational structures that allow for greater taxation are allowed. Excessive taxation destroys societies. Sustainability provides another excuse for destruction.
The other side prefers chaos, and introduces it at every opportunity. As soon as they see something that works, or can work, they do everything they can to introduce chaos into it. Dante described them and their aims as “dis”.
The other side loves chaos because it causes systems to decay. Chaos leads to nothingness faster than organized systems. When chaos is described as “sustainability”, which seems to mean “stability”, they are able to convince many to help them.
A hatred of God is at the core of their every thought. That hatred forced them into a depersonalized creation process that took place without a Supreme Being, hence the “big bang”.
But, the “big bang”, having produced things, is not sustainable, since no thing is. So, their replacement for God cannot be eternal.
Questions we may ask promoters of “sustainability”: Should we try to sustain our own lives? The lives of those around us? If so, do we want to sustain the freedom to sustain our lives in the manner we choose? Since nothing is sustainable, why not just let each person be as free as possible?
The fact that their system is heading for oblivion takes away any excuse to participate in the futility of trying to improve any part of it.
On the other hand, if it is good to make things better, we can see that nothing they have ever done has worked, so the best thing for them to do is to withdraw from political activity.
